Image

Good News For the People's Liberation Army

User avatar
[highlight=#ffffff]Yes, China couldn't be happier with the Biden Administration's efforts to castrate the U.S. military and turn it into a cowering miasma of weak and defenseless snowflakes with no will to fight.

DailyMaiDevine.jpg


[/highlight](click for larger)

User avatar
Thank goodness! I was worried there for awhile.

User avatar
Sadly, Divine -- even though dead -- might be less woke than the current placeholder.

User avatar
Colonel O sez-u, the title of this post about Good News, for the People's Liberation Army, got 'pelipsky's mythical horned rodent of a mind all fluxed capacitated in regards to what news would be good for the People's Liberation Army.

And, this 'good news' is a cheap TransBarbie Flash Gordon 'doll' with a fake plastic rubberplant gun??? Note: Those are hypothetical ' ' marks of grammar to stylizesheet the 'confusion'. BTW. this allows nuance to drip through the comprehension filter a couple more times. Probably needs a few more nuance drips, since we used same comprehension filter three times yesterday.

The People's Liberation Army, ain't interested in no army of the kiddiebubbleBarbieporn. Joe Biden 'knows' better than most why owning an F-15 Eagle is what's 'on the street' buzz today.

Don't come on with that 'you'll shoot your eye out' stuff, Joe. Responsible F16-Eagle use just requires the correct training. All responsible F-15 Eagle users 'know' 'this'. 'pelipsky doesn't even understand why Joe had to bring it up?

Colonel O sez-u, do you know why??
ET???
Margaret???
Does any comrade around here 'know' why Joe even brought this 'information' to our attention.

'pelipsky

User avatar
jackalopelipsky wrote:Joe Biden 'knows' better than most why owning an F-15 Eagle is what's 'on the street' buzz today.Responsible F16-Eagle use just requires the correct training. All responsible F-15 Eagle users 'know' 'this'. 'pelipsky doesn't even understand why Joe had to bring it up?
Colonel O sez-u, do you know why?? Does any comrade around here 'know' why Joe even brought this 'information' to our attention.

'pelipsky

He said it to intimidate his own citizens. He is hell-bent on portraying Conservatives as violent insurgents because they are a threat to his lunatic administration, and he made a sloppy job of projecting machismo by reminding them that their rifles don't match the power of his (actually, our) F-15s. Nevermind that armed Americans far outnumber our armed forces and don't live on easily targeted military bases.

The most revealing takeaway from his rambling, inaccurate, fallacy laden speech is his brandishing of nuclear weapons.

Are we to presume that he will nuke selected parts of America to vanquish his fabricated rifle-owner threat?

Does he think our armed forces will obey unlawful orders to attack their own countrymen with nukes just to humor a senile old man's twisted fantasies and ideological goals?

Does he not realize that nuclear fallout would contaminate and fatally harm millions of non-combatants?

He was supposed to be talking about how to reduce crime, not how to purge his political opponents or restrict the 2nd Amendment (which he clearly does not understand).

He could have ordered prosecutors to do their jobs but he didn't. He could have demanded an end to defunding police but he didn't. He could have instructed the FBI to pursue Antifa, BLM and the Cartels instead of people who happened to be in D.C. on January 6 but he didn't. He could have ended "bail reform" but he didn't.

He is not motivated to control real crime because real crime perpetuates a crisis mode that gives him agency to take drastic measures, but the drastic measures are always aimed at those who oppose his reckless and destructive stewardship of the U.S.S.A.

User avatar
I note that in the portrait-piece on the new Army Chief of Staff there is a paucity of pronouns. Firstly, "He/She/It" privileges the male identifier over the female. Secondly, there is no mention of they, xe, zir, or any other recognized Other. Lastly, such expanded pronoun lists take up too much print space.
THEREFORE ... I propose we eliminate the male hegemony, reduce the typography, and indicate endless possibilities through abbreviation.
THUS ... the new pronoun indicator: "s/h/it."

User avatar
Comrade RedDiaperette, you - as always - cut right to the chase, zoom in on the problem, identify the culprit, expose the capitalist lie, and - dare I say it? - rip the sexist clothing right off of the abominable right-wing extremist white supremacist nazi patriarchic propaganda!

Now, where was I? Oh yeah.

WELL DONE, COMRADE!!

>>> FOR THE PEOPLE!!! <<<

User avatar
Colonel Obeyasezu,

That was great answer to 'pelipsky's over flux capacitated questions.

'pelipsky


 
POST REPLY