New York City is losing cops fast and unable to recruit enough new ones, a problem the city's politicians created by maligning police, going soft on criminals and eliminating cash bail.

Mayor Adams and the other socialist clowns at City Hall may eventually stumble on the idea of drafting illegal migrants for the NYPD, but until then, they've decided to spend more money that they don't have on some very expensive 400-pound robots. 

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2023/09/ ... y-station/




This move probably won't end well, considering that an A.I.-equipped robot of the same model recently committed suicide:   

These robots are going to nip this behavior in the bud. In.the.bud.

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

9/24/2023, 7:22 am

These robots are going to nip this behavior in the bud. In.the.bud.

That was an incredible re-educational film, Colonel O.

Don't know about your secret bunker theater showing, but here's the appropriate newsreal propaganda short playing on secret bunker theaters in Texazistan.

Well, the first step should be short of stopping Sen Cronyn from using robots and those big illuminated “Gun Free Zones” in front of those secret bunkers. However, I believe that robots should insist on a simple test, a test that includes the slaughtering scores of your favorite violent computer game, the release of one's social metric scores, and some form of creative statement discussing the effects of having an unhealthy obsession with gore and violence that could lead to a lucrative book deal and a chance to have a guest appearance on the “View.” We also need to revamp our discussions with robots to ensure that one’s religion, violent temperament, and national origins remain secret and all of those gun-free loopholes that allow suicidal maniacs to cleverly stand outside of abortion clinics, whose members now scour the streets and avenues of feces lined cities to collect cans and bottles to pay for transgender and lesbian abortions should be encouraged to find other forms of self-empowerment. Even with dear leader’s Alzheimer’s ravaged mind, along with most progressives in Congress, all agree that a Constitutional Right to have armed guards at taxpayer's expense against law-abiding citizens vaporizes that obscure second amendment passage in the Bill of Rights. The need for a Marxist progressive presence in the Senate and a fourteen-member Supreme Court would go a long way to provide all the cheques and balances against the last two remaining Republican conservatives who frighten people into buying more guns.

trashmouth wrote: ↑

9/25/2023, 3:09 pm

...all agree that a Constitutional Right to have armed guards at taxpayer's expense against law-abiding citizens vaporizes that obscure second amendment passage in the Bill of Rights. The need for a Marxist progressive presence in the Senate and a fourteen-member Supreme Court would go a long way to provide all the cheques and balances against the last two remaining Republican conservatives who frighten people into buying more guns.

Exactly.