I came across this CRT/DEI "Oppression Matrix" chart while reading about how it's being forced down the throats of teachers In Springfield, Missouri.
[click graphic for larger in new window] 

It's a lousy graphic all around, ironically designed for compelling acceptance of highly oppressive, overtly racist CRT/DEI ideology that lumps everyone into groups but applies "intersectionality" only to "marginalized" (favored) groups.

Note the defiant but curiously white arms in chains (wrong color for oppressors). Note the banded rows in the colors of the transsexual pride flag. Note the word "oppression" reappearing twice in the column already labelled "Types of Oppression" (did they run out of "ism" suffixes?)
What does "Border" social groups really mean? The chart is crawling with woke language, and of course the thread-worn term, "Classism," is included because—after all—inclusion is a key component of the neo-communist CRT and DEI right-think.   

You can read about it at this link:  Judges question $300k fine on teachers challenging antiracism training but I found it so inspiring that I recreated the chart in the same shitty style but with an honest interpretation of the original:
[click graphic for larger in new window] 

 

This called for some Leninaid, comrads.http://leninade.realsoda.com/
Made where the new communists live.

Can I buy carbon credits to offset my heteronormative white hard working tax paying bullshit detecting wonderful self?? Asking for a friend.

Papa Kalashnikook wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 9:28 am

Can I buy carbon credits to offset my heteronormative white hard working tax paying bullshit detecting wonderful self?? Asking for a friend.

Papa K, the only carbon you can exchange is you. Just compost yourself and all the torture will end.

Your mind escaped jackalope comrade. XXX

Epistemologically, cultural Marxism nullifies itself.

On the one hand they claim objective reasoning is “white” and part of an overall system of oppression (just like the Marxists said of “bourgeois” society when economic class was their thing).

In rejecting objective reasoning as the means of gaining and validating knowledge they therefore - if challenged by anyone savvy enough - can only claim to know what they profess to have anything to do with reality by some other means of knowing.

The entire edifice of their belief system relies on them claiming to have privileged knowledge that they can simply see and know by means of transcendence above and beyond the ability of mere ordinary people to see.

They can’t claim it as objective knowledge. Objective knowledge is part of a system of oppression and has no actual basis in human cognition.

Their claims to know what they claim aren’t objectively discovered - they simply see what is true somehow by their higher means of seeing.

So it follows we must submit to what they prescribe as they are the high priests gifted with special means of knowing; they have risen above it all.

They are high priests of what has become a government imposed religion.

It is a religion. It has all the attributes of religion.

If they were intellectually honest about it it wouldn’t be a big social problem. This is how I think it should be challenged.

It is obviously unconstitutional to impose a government religion.

Margaret wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 12:07 pm

Epistemologically, cultural Marxism nullifies itself....

Very astute observations, Margaret.

By the second decade of this century, race grifters found that their weak rhetoric was was exposed at every turn as illogical. Reason and logic was choking their every claim, so they resorted to a bold (and ridiculous) new tactic by countering that "logic is a white European racist concept."

This was quickly followed by claiming almost anything indisputable was invalid for the same reason—including mathematics and more recently reading and writing.

However,  if Cultural Marxism is somehow determined to be a religion (it will never be) it would come under 1st Amendment protection, which is no solution.

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 12:24 pm

However,  if Cultural Marxism is somehow determined to be a religion (it will never be) it would come under 1st Amendment protection, which is no solution.

Never say never.

1st Amendment protection doesn't give a religion the means to be a State religion. It nullifies it.

Margaret wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 1:21 pm

1st Amendment protection doesn't give a religion the means to be a State religion. It nullifies it.

Cultural Marxism is already the de facto religion of the Biden Executive Branch, half of the House, over half the Senate, a third of the Supreme Court and too many local governments.

Given that Cultural Marxism—if it continues unchecked—will collapse the government, one need only wonder which will happen first: a Constitutional challenge or the nullification of the Constitution?    

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 1:53 pm

Margaret wrote: ↑

2/18/2024, 1:21 pm

1st Amendment protection doesn't give a religion the means to be a State religion. It nullifies it.

Cultural Marxism is already the de facto religion of the Biden Executive Branch, half of the House, over half the Senate, a third of the Supreme Court and too many local governments.

Given that Cultural Marxism—if it continues unchecked—will collapse the government, one need only wonder which will happen first: a Constitutional challenge or the nullification of the Constitution?    

"Cultural Marxism is already the de facto religion of the Biden Executive Branch, half of the House, over half the Senate, a third of the Supreme Court and too many local governments."...and too many "Protestant" churches of feeling good about yourself, without mentioning the likes and dislikes of God.

The He Get's Us ad reads like Book of Karenthians which teaches, how to make people beneath you, wash that foot, again. The Alinsky sucker punch telling believers not to hate heralds in the 'new' Jesus, who had to overthrow his Father for being such a Supreme Dictator. The INXS soundtrack is not by accident. In excess lawlessness is what the AlinskyJesus defines and it's meant to knock you on your knees, comrade. Rising from your knees is the hate crime according to the Father God eliminating AlinskyJesus.

Listen to the Father Godless purpose for "He Gets Us" ad. The AlinskyJesus is devoid of his Father to whom the biblical Jesus was obedient in all things.



This guy reminds Jackalopelipsky of a early 90's film by a Cambodian director telling the story of the Marxist Culture Revolution in Cambodia. The good or bad aspects of the Culture Revolution are left for the viewer to decide. The film tells the story of the wife of a Revolution Leader, He leaves to Revolutionize Cambodia, she is sent to work in a rice field, and the couple's children are sent to Revolution Camps. The wife/mother can accept the rice field assignment, but the loss of their/her children, this she can not understand. She writes letters of petition to her husband for permission to visit their children.

The Revolutionary Leader/Husband/Father makes an Official Trip to Rice Farm. Flags are snapping on his Revolution Army procession. He is an Important to the Cambodian Culture Revolution Leader.

The Revolutionary Leader/Husband/Father spends the entire evening talking just like the "He Gets Us" guy, who after the Alinsky, Christians sucker punch, to knock believers to their knees. Theological heresy is more important than a God fearing family. comrades. Over and over, the Cambodian Wife/Mother laments the loss of their family. The husband father is not moved by her emotion. The next morning the Cambodian Revolution Leader procession drives away from the Rice Farm,

The ending scene of the film is of the Revolution Leader's Wife/Mother, visiting warehoused human remains. Shelves and shelves of skulls and bones of those who perished in The Cultural Revolution are viewed. The woman examines every grouping of bones, because she's looking for their/her family.

The guy explaining the purpose of the "He Gets Us" ad sounds just like the Cambodian Revolutionary Leader who willingly sacrificed others, even his own family's lives, for The Culture Revolution. The AlinskyJesus is not about redeeming mankind from our self-destruction, Instead the AlinskyJesus celebrates the destruction.

I'm surprised there isn't a category for speciism, where the victims are dogs canine co-habitants and other non-human domestic parners who are being oppressed simply by virtue of not being treated as equals to humans. Saying "good boy" after your domestic partner sniffed your hand is demeaning and condescending. And now there are lawyers who specialize in righing that wrong, seeking compensation for years of patronizing belly rubs.

Red Square wrote: ↑

2/20/2024, 10:02 pm

I'm surprised there isn't a category for speciism...

Hence the disclaimer at the bottom of the chart. But your offering and any others are entirely welcome.

Critical Species Theory

Critical Appliance Theory

Critical Eye Color Theory

Critical Critical Theory

There is no limiting factor to the Left's Manichaeism.

[click graphic for larger in new window]