Time Magazine Reagan Obama cover



a more Truthful cover would look like this...




Trying to find humor in the Time cover is hard for me. This is utterly shameless. The guy is the anthesis of President Reagan and Time produces something like this? Mouthpieces of the regime, that is all they are anymore.

Next month!


I denounce Maksim for having more equal talent and demand that it be re-distributed to the less fortunate (like me).


Emmanuel Goldstein



<prog off>
This is just desperation on the part of the progressives at Time, trying to attract "independents" as the president's policies fail.

<prog on>
Real headline: Why Obama

Quote: "It's something I always wanted to do!"
Where is the Internet Commissar? He does not want me to have to motivate him into fixing People's Characters!
=======================================
To much vodka Comrade? People's Karakters were never broken, they have always worked and always will, just like glorious Soviet system.
- Supreme Commander of Thread Jacking & Stuffed Mice Toys™


Comrade Whoopie
I got this one Buffoon...I denounce Maksim for having more equal talent and demand that it be re-distributed to the less fortunate (like me).
Ditto for me also. It's just not fair that he comes up with brilliant ideas before I have the time, skill and opportunity to develop them before he does. Can't we claim we "thought of it first"? Are there potential copyright claims? Oops, I forgot, intellectual property is still "property" and hence is most unprogressive (except of course royalties due to our loyal comrades on the left in Hollywood).
Unfortunately if Maksim's talents (and Red Square's) were equally distributed thoughout the Cube Empire, they would become so diluted that all art work would become a pale, almost invisible immitation of the genius of our two greatest artists. But wait -- isn't that the whole idea behind our Redistributionist Doctrine?
How can we accomplish this noble goal for the Greater Good? Just think, all creativity would be uniform and equal. There would be no outstanding artists because all artists would be outstanding.
Whoopie, you've really hit on a great idea. Now all we have to do is capture both of them and exract the essence of their talents. Then we will put it into test-tubes and have it mass produced and then distributed to all members of the Cube.
--KOOK


If Obama is the absolute bestest, greatest, smartest President of the United States that the world has ever known, then why the constant overhyped comparisons to so many of his predecessors? If he’s so danged special, then shouldn’t he be able to stand alone as the new high water mark, the impossibly raised bar, The One that leaves all others in the dust and to whom no one else could even dream, let alone Hope, to hold a candle?
If he’s really reminiscent of FDR or JFK or whoever (Reagan? Puh-leeze!) then I honestly don’t see how he can be all that special and worthy of extra fuss.
And is it just me, or has anyone else ever noticed that they only do this with Democrat presidents, never Republicans? A Republican can stand alone on his own merit, but it seems a Democrat must always be compared to past Democrats.
Or when things get really desperate, past Republicans.


Comrade Whoopie
I got this one Buffoon...I denounce Maksim for having more equal talent and demand that it be re-distributed to the less fortunate (like me).
I'm done denouncing, its gotten me nowhere! I've been casing his joint and compiling a file on said Maksim. You wouldn't believe the company he keeps and the antics they antic!
If that doesn't work I'll start a campaign to abolish Photoshop.
Let's see him be cute then!





If you look carefully at this cover and hold it in the correct light, the orange juice writing of "Waste of" wiill appear on the cover.
The full name is "Waste of Time" which clearly designates the true purpose!


Who can ever forget the rude arrogance of Ronaldus Raygun when faced with the Current Truth!
I'm sure he would show the same disregard for the brilliance that is the One today.







"TIME" spelled backwards is "EMIT" - a verb which implies the opposite of "listen", "observe", etc, things journalism used to do. Like in "emit propaganda".
Probably just a coincidence.




When I first saw that cover with Reagan and Obama in that pose, I wanted to vomit.....but then again, is this any surprise from such a rag as Time? Of course, too, could it be that President Obama's popularity is waining so much that Time HAS to pose him in "friendliness" with the most popular President of the USA in History? What better way to buoy Prez. O's flailing Numbers than show him as "another" Reagan (despite the clarity that he is actually President Reagan's exact antithesis)???


I didn't realize this was a real Time magazine cover. I thought it was the sister publication to Prog Fantasy.


Red Square
iOwnTheWorld comrades have their own version - http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=57742This is this most impressed backward cover I've ever seen. Time Mag is truly something most special but they should have airbrushed out that nasty teabagging sign the dead conservative placed on dear Leader!


(Unlike our hero Lenin who is still fresh as a daisy)





Could it be that
What if the Peoples ™

A 100% PERFECT MATTER - ANTI MATTER REACTION & POSSIBLY AN ENDLESS SUPPLY OF PURE ENERGY FOR THE MASSES!
Raaaygun could be the final piece in the undoing of the filthy kapitalist pigs greed - how fitting.
We will need to budget this research in our next 5 year plan, no?



I love it, better than porno! (ok maybe not, but almost)


Their tax policies are nearly identical.


Comrade Tooorisky
It is obvious from their economic policies, the two had a lot in common.Their tax policies are nearly identical.
As evidenced by the blistering speed of the economic recovery.


Perhaps the most appropriate cover would be "Barack Obama" and Neville Chamberlain waving his sheet of paper signed by Hitler.
Prog ON


It should have been the only one with a brain capable of korrect thought that was propagated out of that family of troglodytes.




Commissarka Pinkie
Maybe this belongs on Red Square’s Barely Socratic Questions over at The Current Truth, but still I must ask:If Obama is the absolute bestest, greatest, smartest President of the United States that the world has ever known, then why the constant overhyped comparisons to so many of his predecessors? If he’s so danged special, then shouldn’t he be able to stand alone as the new high water mark, the impossibly raised bar, The One that leaves all others in the dust and to whom no one else could even dream, let alone Hope, to hold a candle?
If he’s really reminiscent of FDR or JFK or whoever (Reagan? Puh-leeze!) then I honestly don’t see how he can be all that special and worthy of extra fuss.
And is it just me, or has anyone else ever noticed that they only do this with Democrat presidents, never Republicans? A Republican can stand alone on his own merit, but it seems a Democrat must always be compared to past Democrats.
Or when things get really desperate, past Republicans.
And why the hell is Obama never compared to OBAMUGABE (Me)???









