Image

What Would a Communist Oklahoma Look Like?

User avatar
What a glorious morning! I opened my Google+ account this morning to see this:

What Would a Communist America Look Like?


Image

Who would have thought that the Glorious World of Next Tuesday would arrive first in Oklahoma! Perhaps the message is, "Communism is OK?"

User avatar
"There would be equal pay and benefits for men and women."

What about the other 48 gender categories?

User avatar
The Workers Monthly must be where MSNBC gets its news, and most universities obtain their history. Here is a sample of "fact" from this month's newsletter regarding the Great Depression:
"As the depression ravaged the capitalist world, the Soviet Union was booming, with their citizens experiencing leaps and bounds in rising literacy, opportunity, housing, and health. This news was not lost on homeless, police-abused, and starving Americans."

Gee, it makes me wonder why my grandparents ever left, just to settle in a Kapitalist-run steel town in Pennsylvania where my grandfather worked for the proverbial gold watch! Had they stayed, they could have enjoyed the leaping and bounding opportunities afforded to them! Now I feel like a victim - or viktim - and it makes me feel so disenfranchised I think I'll go to the local social security office, apply for disability and Obamacare and liberate myself from my job so that I can write leftist poetry praising our Dear Leader for his transformation of this country into the utopia I could have been born into.

Of course, everyone gets equal pay and benefits. After all, zero is a number, too.

User avatar
If I knew how to work with Photoshop and upload files, I would append this poster with a few more pictures:

- A Wise Party Leader leading the masses into the bright future.
- The Party relieving you of the need to think for yourselves and making all decisions for you.
- Glorious National Security officers weeding out and re-educating enemies of the people.
- Everyone needs to sacrifice for the Common Good, bringing the living standard to the 1910 level.
- And in the end, the largest picture would be a magic fairy with a big bag of cash sprinkling everyone with money to finance this glorious sunny utopia.


User avatar
The Glorious World of Next Tuesday looks bright indeed in Oklahoma. There was one aspect that gave me pause. "Veterans would receive the treatment they DESERVE..." Why single out veterans to "receive what they deserve"? I would think there are plenty of classes of citizens who should get what they deserve. Maybe they are just going to start with veterans. Cut down on resistance later. I get nervous when ever anybody tells me I'm about to get what's coming to me. Viva Red Oklahoma!

User avatar
The authors of this agitprop seem to be ignorant of the communist theory, or they think everyone else is ignorant, or both.

They say that food will be free, education will be free, while genders will receive equal pay and workers will get full value for their labor.

A contradiction? We all now that communism ends the use of money. Hmm...

They also mention veterans getting treatment for sacrificing for this country, when we all know that "sacrificing for this country" means acts of racist imperialist aggression. Besides, communism ends the existence of states and state borders. Hmm...

They say housing will be affordable and all of it will be of excellent quality - meaning that you could buy a great individual house. But there will be no money, remember? And there will be no private property either. How can anyone even claim it's their house?

Like I always said, when it comes to communism, Americans are hopeless. They may try, but they'll never understand the essence of collective living. They are too individualistic. That's why the original population of the USA needs to die out and be replaced by Third World collectivists. This is where the progressive immigration policy comes in...

User avatar
Lets see, get up when you are told to, dress like everyone else because that's all there is, stand in line for food, they give you slop and you eat what you can keep down. You work all day and into the night, in all kinds of weather, wherever in the world you could be the most uncomfortable...shower in an open bay, sleep in the same room with 39 of your closest friends, do what you are told, don't ask questions, don't bitch about authority, and start over again in the morning... Where have I heard this before? Image

User avatar
Yes comrades, This whole socialism thing is GREAT! I have it here in my warm, Safe prison, and I am just adoring it all!

gulag.jpg


User avatar
What Would a Communist Oklahoma Look Like?

th-8.jpeg
reddawn_120704.gif
The attachment reddawn_120704.gif is no longer available
article-2237717-162F7D94000005DC-257_634x415.jpg
red-dawn-2012-dad.jpg
Red_Dawn_Avenge_Me.jpg
red-dawn-dad-1984.jpg
redawn.jpg


User avatar
At their strong communist website cpok.us (not the blog) there are videos and much more. Directly following The 7 Points of Marxist-Leninist Unity, the District Meeting minutes of 04/07/13 address the importance of strong communist direction of front organizations as explained to new party member Comrade Jeron:

Comrade Jeron asked how popular front organizations are
incorporated into the Party.

Comrade Daniel explained these allow public attraction to
Marxist politics without triggering capitalist indoctrinated
fear inducing cues of “Socialism, Communism, or Marxism”.
Through diverse popular front organizations dedicated to what
are socialist goals anyway, proletarians still too under the
influence of capitalist indoctrination to consider Marxian
political science, can find organized platforms from which to

express their political concerns, and in popular front mass
organizations be provided the intellectual and informational
opportunities to develop more complete class consciousness,
leading them by their own solidified reasoning to the Marxist,
Leninist, Socialist, and Communist cause.

Not recorded in the minutes, new party member Comrade Jeron: "No, no, no. I wasn't asking about the purpose of front groups. My question was how do you incorporate them into the party? Who do you collaborate with? Which organizations? What individuals? Who, what, why, when, and where? And could you speak louder and closer to this pen I'm holding in front of your face, Comrade."


User avatar
Interesting to see that bit about the front organizations, Comrade Otis. These have been active in the United States [spit] since at least the 1930's, with funding and support from the KGB.

I wonder where they've been getting their funding since the old Soviet Union collapsed? Hmmm...

User avatar
You say KGB, I say NSA/IRS.

Constantinople/Istanbul.

Tomato/tomato.

What difference, at this point, does it make?

User avatar
R.O.C.K. in the USSA wrote:You say KGB, I say NSA/IRS.

Constantinople/Istanbul.

Tomato/tomato.

What difference, at this point, does it make?
That nobody's business but the turks.

User avatar
I used to have doubts thoughtcrime that communism could deliver food that is "healthy, fresh, and freely available," but these things are clearly visible in the accompanying photo. In fact, in all the photos communist life is indistinguishable from life under Western capitalism.

User avatar
Mikhail Lysenkomann wrote:I wonder where they've been getting their funding since the old Soviet Union collapsed? Hmmm...
From American taxpayers?

User avatar
Red is Tribute wrote:In fact, in all the photos communist life is indistinguishable from life under Western capitalism.
Until you remove the despicable false sheen the Koch brothers have cast over Western Capitalism, comrade!

>spit<

User avatar
I wish all of this had happened 20-30 years earlier. Face it, old age is a bitch. Trying to get back enough flexibility to kiss my ass goodbye at the proper moment ain't as easy as it once was.

User avatar
[img]/images/clipart/Prog_On.gif[/img]
Someone named Doughboy posted this most outstanding point-by-point summary in a comment on that site, which is very worth reading:


---------------------------------------------

1. Free, comprehensive, universal . . . and sub-par.
Don't get me started on how "every other country has universal health care." They do, sure, but it's not what you think. Only a few of them are single-payer, and they either have long wait times and arbitrary rejections, or they are a "pay out of pocket and get reimbursed later" like France. Most of them operate on a 2-tier system where a basic level of coverage is guaranteed, but everything else is paid for out of pocket or by private insurance. Some of them operate with a fully-private system with an insurance mandate, like Germany and Japan. Everyone else has a cheaper system because the US system is dominated by monopolies and cartels backed by government rather than locally owned and operated facilities.

2. The places where housing is *unaffordable* are all places trying to live the progressive dream. Places like Utah, Texas and other deeply red states have incredibly affordable housing.

3. The reason why healthy food is more expensive in the US is most likely because the garbage crap is made of highly subsidized ingredients including soybeans and high-fructose corn syrup from subsidized corn. Another interesting reason is that Americans don't believe in seasonal food, they just want whatever it is they normally have instead of picking whatever is in season. Buying stuff out-of-season is more expensive.

4. Education *would be low cost and high quality* if it weren't for, again, monopolies and cartels dominating the business, protected and subsidized by government.

5. Seniors *used to retire* in comfort and dignity back when America was still capitalist instead of corporate-fascist. Social Security is one of those things that took retirement away from Seniors, ironically. With the mandatory retirement safety net, people quit saving for retirement unless it's subsidized/partially funded by their employers. Oh, not to mention all the lies that people are told about "8% growth" in markets forever, so they under-save and rely on this mysterious "growth" to give them the rest of what they need.

6. I'm not sure communism would do any better than what we have now.

7. Workers must always receive *less* than the full value of their labor, otherwise there can be no gain for anyone in the economy. In any transaction, including a labor transaction, value must be *created.* That is, the buyer must feel that he is receiving more than the value of his money, and the seller must feel that he is receiving more than the effort put into obtaining the item. When it balances out to equal on both ends, the effort put into the transaction becomes zero.

8. Women and men are already getting equal pay. The "pay gap" myth comes from the fact that women tend to go into lesser-paid fields like psychology/social work and education, while men tend to go into higher paying fields like engineering and business. Furthermore, women are more likely to take years off to raise children, and are more likely to work part time. When you account for these factors and look at same-job, same-experience, same-education-level, women and men are paid equally. If you want to address the wage gap, you have to push the culture, not the policies. Push women into higher-paid fields. Push men to stay home and raise kids.

9. There would still be inequality, but the inequality would be the Party Members and politically connected versus the rest. (Oh wait, a lot of the inequality is *already* due to that in the US). In a truly capitalist system, the only source of inequality would be inequality of effort and skill. We had something much closer to that in the 1950's than today, and it was much more "capitalist" and "deregulated" back then than it is today.

10. Equal rights under communism? Uh, that has nothing to do with communism. Take a good look at Mother Russia. In all her communism, she puts forth propaganda and makes laws to push gays back into their closets. The Communist strategy for destroying America proposed to introduce loose sexuality into America because they believed it would destabilize the country. Homosexuality is related to loose sexuality, but it need not be tied to it.

11. If women get full reproductive rights, do men get full rights to choose not to pay for child support? Do men get full rights and equal chance to get custody of children? If you're going to talk about reproductive rights, then be sure to talk about the reproductive rights of men or else you're being a gender bigot.

12. Racism is not something you can address by policy without creating more racism and encoding that racism into law. The only way to address it is culturally. I firmly believe that the civil rights movement got its momentum from the fact that so many white kids were raised by black nannies instead of their absent socialite white moms. Racism is fading, but not due to any amount of laws prohibiting it -- in fact, the laws pushing racial quotas et al are making whatever trace of racism is left keep a foothold in the previous generation. It will be gone by the next generation regardless of law, unless law holds it encoded.

In short, quit pretending your ideology is better than anyone else's and get the facts before you fire off your propaganda.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:The Communist strategy for destroying America proposed to introduce loose sexuality into America because they believed it would destabilize the country.
I see that someone else out there understands what the Gay Rights movement was actually about! Yes, it was part of the KGB's "subversion" campaign. Which has been highly successful, by the way: look at all the Useful Idiots now on the loose in the USSA.

We are winning, Comrades! Soon the USSA will be more Socialist than Mother Russia!

User avatar
What Would a Communist Oklahoma Look Like?

13.jpg

User avatar
Image Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.... I'm sorry... I can't even stay in character with this one! This is one of those treasures you find that you want to preserve for others to say "Check this out! It's a good laugh."

EDIT

Just to be clear, I'm refering to the original image, the "what would a communist America look like" not this article or to Mikhail Lysenkomann.


 
POST REPLY