Image
Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism. We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is unethical, while a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit of diversity, inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners. Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.

WHO'S THE TRUE PEOPLE'S CHAMP?


User avatar
Che. Beyond a doubt it is Che. Anyone who can murder hundreds of thousands of people and end up on every t-shirt in high school is a true peoples champion.

Yeah, but Fedor has never been beaten, Betty. The only option is to have Che fight Fedor.

User avatar
Woot! Gladiatorial deathmatch! Winner gets their face on a t-shirt1

User avatar
But.... we cannot allow one to win Premier Betty... They must both win, or both "feel good" at least. Oh the dilemma!!

Since Che never felt any compassion for those thousands he slaughtered for socialism, then he could not feel anything (ok, so he pleaded for his life like a little bitch until they shot him, but that doesn't count in the new history portrayed on the shirts).

Thus they must both be winners.

User avatar
It might be a little difficult for someone like Che to share the Title Belt of People's Champ with someone else. I foresee a mysterious disappearance of 1 or more of those listed.

User avatar
Hmmm.... point taken. Let the Deathmatch begin!


 
POST REPLY