Comrades, as we all know have been forced to learn have come to understand, comrades can identify as whatever they want to be and we must accommodate and accept their identification. Evidence™ is not a question. It's never needed. The Party™ is all the Evidence™ that's approved.

This, of course, includes the scientific community, which may be a factor of the plus in the LBGTQ+ community. Nobody is sure and not enough grant money has been allocated to initiate an ongoing study into whether or not those who identify as scientists should be a plus.

Regardless, many, who identify as scientists, are claiming that the Sun (that f'n massive star just a few light seconds away from The Collective™) has nothing to do with global climate. We must take them seriously. 

The Collective™ is at fault for not paying close enough attention to The Party™. The Party™ knows how to control the weather and the Sun. Follow the directives of The Party™ and Our Climate™ and Our Democracy™ will remain intact.

FORWARD!

The Party is the center of The Collective’s climate system.

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

6/11/2023, 8:25 am

The Party is the center of The Collective’s climate system.

Comrades, we are fortunate to have the climate gigolo, scientist John F'n Kerry, and the "Inconvenient Truth" scientist known worldwide as the "Goracle," who are clear examples of progressives who identify as noble scientists. It is because of their endless hours of sacrifice, the endless hours of long-winded dinner engagements, and all of those pleasant hours of cascading in the clouds promoting mankind’s responsibility for Climate Change that they have earned that right. It’s scientific consensus that anyone can become a scientist, especially people who favor aggrandizement over science. And, largely because deep down inside their cognitive uncertainty, there is a large basket of empirical regularities that may explain a set of behavioral anomalies identified as whatever they want to be. However, due to the nature of specific cognitive processes involved in the adoption of the uncertainty of these scientists is still a matter of debate. Comments and discussions will be used to catch evil transgressors in the act of direct disobedience to “their” science. We know who you are........ 

trashmouth wrote: ↑

6/11/2023, 11:33 am

there is a large basket of empirical regularities that may explain a set of behavioral anomalies 

I'm wondering, comrade, if you're referring to the basket containing deplorables, who certainly have behavioural anomalies, according to Party™ protocol and regulations.
 

I would like these to be posted on social media as a response every time some gender-obsessed or global-warming ignoramus declares that he "believes in science."

Comrades, as stated in the original post, The Party™ knows how to control the climate and the Sun and here is all the proof you need:

Don’t forget to take comrades identifying as Professors of Climate Change seriously, either.