It's kind of satisfying to see a liberal journalist take a conservative tone after resigning from her position at The New York Times due to pressure from the DEI/CRT mob.

I largely agree with her presentation and conclusions, though I find it hard to believe this graduate of the very liberal Columbia University and member of "The Jewish Community" (whatever that means) is not still a liberal. Even if not, her years in the liberal workspace resonate in her choice of words:

"...a man was being held to account because of things their teenage daughter said."

Note the PC use of the gender-free their instead of his in that sentence?

As I said, I largely agree with Bari Weiss and I find it satisfying that she's taken a conservative stance on the DEI/CRT issue, but I'm satisfied in a schadenfreude sort of way.

While Weiss concentrated on some of the history of Jews being oppressed, she devoted not a second to the history of New York City's very liberal "Jewish Community" of politically active Reformed Jews, many of whom advocated loudly since the turn of the last century for workplace reform, education reform, women's suffrage, labor unions, teachers unions, feminism, social reform, socialism and even communism.

New York's very liberal "Jewish Community," to which Bari Weiss belongs, has had a pervasive influence, not least of which is on the educational system, locally and nationally—the same system that serves as an incubator for the radicalism against which Weiss now rails.

Not at all to detract from Bari Weiss's message or current stance, but as 
stated in several ways in the Bible and New Testament, "...as ye sow, so shall ye reap."

* * * * *

NOTE: readers may find additional insight on this topic here: https://spectator.org/when-white-people ... ce-theory/


[The author of this post is a native of Manhattan who attended NYC public schools, has friends and family in "The Jewish Community" and has been a NYC Municipal employee]