Image

LOVE Czar for Marriage Equality and Biblical Alterations


User avatar
I second the motion for LOVE Czar. This is brilliant, Comrade!

All the talk of "love is love" and "marriage equality" and "freedom to marry" is wonderfully distracting from the theft our main objective. The masses are blissfully unaware that we are actually trading them one thing for another. It's a "quid pro quo" transaction.... a barter! We're stealing from them allowing them to atone for their guilt at being mean to gay people! You see, henceforth, they must relinquish the ideal that every child is entitled to a mother and a father, so that gays can marry. As faithful Party members know, the bourgeois institution of "family" must be eliminated, and what better way to strike at the very heart of "family" than by removing the words "mother and father" from the legal code? Canada got away with this in 2005, and France is on it's way there. It may take us a little while longer to implement this than we want, but I have full confidence we'll get there:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/0 ... r-neutral/

https://www.startribune.com/opinion/com ... ml?refer=y

As long as we can keep the masses worried about what Kim Kardashian is doing, Comrade Michelle Obama's bangs, and other trifles, we will have no trouble gaining control of the definition of "marriage" and "family." And never forget to encourage your friends and family that "the marriage issue really isn't that big of a deal." Bill O'Reilly recently said as much. It's clear we are making excellent progress on this front.

Regardless of what our opposition claims, my dear comrades, never forget that gender-neutral language is our goal. It's ambiguous, doesn't rely on horrid concept of "natural law," and is completely subjective. Gender-neutral language is our friend!

User avatar
ObamaBibleFullyProgressive.jpg
Comrade Olga, I must point out that we DO have a fully progressive King Barack Version Bible, but - due to Sequestration and not enough people sending in their $3.00 donations - it has not yet been published and distributed!

User avatar
Commissar of Gender Equality wrote:And never forget to encourage your friends and family that "the marriage issue really isn't that big of a deal." Bill O'Reilly recently said as much.

Bill O'Reilly said those against gay marriage are "thumping the Bible." Bill for LOVE Czar!

User avatar
This is truly the most spectacular piece of news we have read thus far, comrades.

Long live the LOOOOOOVE Czar!!

User avatar
The liberal media is all astir over the new Pope looking less traditional. Although too early to say for certain, maybe the Catholic Church can now alter some of those old stick-in-the-mud positions. Certainly the Deity was surprised when "science" discovered that our homo sexual friends were genetically programmed with gay genes. Science did discover that, right? Maybe I'm overstating the position. In an case, maybe we will finally see the wisdom in embracing gay priests and happy gay Catholic couples.

And can't we all agree that if God could have foreseen how lucrative pornography would become in our future Internet world he would have loosened up on those rigid sexual immorality mandates? The church needs perpetual funding, does it not? Can Our Mother of Chastity look forward to a new title and role, for the good of the Church and thanks to some future theological adjustment?


liberal church.jpg

User avatar
NaughtyNun.jpg
You could be onto something there, Comrade Comrade!

User avatar
R.O.C.K. - my granddaughter and I paid a visit to Pope Francis recently and I may have to rethink my posting techniques and language.

He was kind but surprisingly honest with me...
he is a nice man!

He must follow The People's Cube...


pope-francis-me.jpg

User avatar
God.jpg
Funny - I was just talking to his boss this afternoon...

User avatar
R.O.C.K. - I never thought I'd say this but in the name of LOVE...

I think we should get the band back together!


playing-in-a-band.jpg

User avatar
You definitely need to get the band back together. I still can't get the sound of it out of my head after all those years...



User avatar
Sorry, Comrade May - I really don't think I'm cut out for Little Pink Houses... I'd be a lot more at home with, say,



Much closer to my guitar style.

But to each his or her own :)

And Comrade People's Director - it was a beautiful thing!

Meanwhile, back at the Love Ranch - I second Bill O'Reilly for Love Czar!!

User avatar
The No Spin Love Advice Zone- I love it.

orielly love czar.jpg

The Newspeak is man(?)ifest, again. Is not what Real issue is Comrades. What is desired by Progs is not Marriage, but DIVORCE; from that antique construct called Morality. Morality was once the Good side of the archaic and out of date good-evil value system. Now that glorious Revolution is almost complete and that Kollective has redefined Good and Evil, reactionary reprobates who cling to old Morality are now Evil. So is no problem anymore, da? Is not problem for bachelors anyway. Besides, definition of marriage should be broadened again so I can Marry THINGS. That way I cannot be separated from them against MY Will. I Love things which please me. This begs question, who and or what does Love Czar Love? We of Collective do know Love Czar must Love Power as Chairman of People's Party does, and that bigamy of any sort will also be sanctioned as all other Czars love Power too. They would never willingly give it up. Now that Proletariat is to be let in on this fix, pursuit of Collective happiness can be fulfilled and shall Not go unrequited by the State. We are told we have a Right to Marry as we have a Right to things, whether earned or not. So Tomorrow, April 1st of the year 2013 of the Common Era, I will go to City Hall here in Gatewaygrad and apply to Marry everyThing I Possess until Death do us part. My lawyer will make the vows on behalf of my stuff, and since City Hall is run by his friends, should be easy.

User avatar
Comrade Pistov, please be sure to keep us updated so that we on TheCube™ can appropriately congratulate you all on your marriage!

User avatar
Comrade Pistov wrote:The Newspeak is man(?)ifest, again. Is not what Real issue is Comrades. What is desired by Progs is not Marriage, but DIVORCE; from that antique construct called Morality. Morality was once the Good side of the archaic and out of date good-evil value system. Now that glorious Revolution is almost complete and that Kollective has redefined Good and Evil, reactionary reprobates who cling to old Morality are now Evil. So is no problem anymore, da? Is not problem for bachelors anyway. Besides, definition of marriage should be broadened again so I can Marry THINGS. That way I cannot be separated from them against MY Will. I Love things which please me. This begs question, who and or what does Love Czar Love? We of Collective do know Love Czar must Love Power as Chairman of People's Party does, and that bigamy of any sort will also be sanctioned as all other Czars love Power too. They would never willingly give it up. Now that Proletariat is to be let in on this fix, pursuit of Collective happiness can be fulfilled and shall Not go unrequited by the State. We are told we have a Right to Marry as we have a Right to things, whether earned or not. So Tomorrow, April 1st of the year 2013 of the Common Era, I will go to City Hall here in Gatewaygrad and apply to Marry everyThing I Possess until Death do us part. My lawyer will make the vows on behalf of my stuff, and since City Hall is run by his friends, should be easy.

This is brilliant. Solves many progish concerns with a single ceremony. You may want to run this past the folks HERE.

April Fool Comrades
Besides, on advice of counsel is quickly realized that the State will demand annual inventory and personal property taxes would...you don't want to go there. Am considering liquidation of assets and then consuming all said liquid with substantial alcoholic content.
Cheers

User avatar
Image
Filthy Bible thumpers...Why can't people be more mainstream and Kool like me?

User avatar
I'm going to sue my ex-boyfriends for not marrying me. Or perhaps I can persuade them to reconsider.

Well, don't i have a RIGHT to marriage?

And when did marriage get so groovy, anyway? I thought we were supposed to hate the family as the nest of bourgeoisie thought.


 
POST REPLY