Margaret wrote: ↑

4/26/2022, 12:05 pm

1. "World hunger" hasn't been a concern for decades. Despite the fact that the term is still bandied about by the uninformed, world food supply and distribution has effectively ended it except for localized instances although it's likely to return thanks to the effort of globalists to induce a food shortage.

2. $43 billion would not be enough to end "world hunger" even if it existed or should come to exist again. It sounds like a massive sum until one steps back and looks at economies of scale: the U.S. alone farts away about a billion dollars an hour. We should be more concerned about China and Bill Gates buying up much of the farmlands in the United States and how enviromanics demand we continue to divert animal-feed to wasteful and inefficient ethanol production.
 

Elizabeth Warren weighs in.

Apparently billionaires aren't subject to the law. Luckily Elizabeth Warren has taken upon herself royal queenly powers over all that which she surveys and can decide what is a crime and go about punishing people for the crimes she pulls out of her royal person. Now that's protecting equality before the law so that we don't live in a society of social rank so that we don't live under a tyranny of people that just pull laws out of their royal persons, i.e. the American idea of democracy.

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

4/26/2022, 12:28 pm

Margaret wrote: ↑

4/26/2022, 12:05 pm

1. "World hunger" hasn't been a concern for decades. Despite the fact that the term is still bandied about by the uninformed, world food supply and distribution has effectively ended it except for localized instances although it's likely to return thanks to the effort of globalists to induce a food shortage.

2. $43 billion would not be enough to end "world hunger" even if it existed or should come to exist again. It sounds like a massive sum until one steps back and looks at economies of scale: the U.S. alone farts away about a billion dollars an hour. We should be more concerned about China and Bill Gates buying up much of the farmlands in the United States and how enviromanics demand we continue to divert animal-feed to wasteful and inefficient ethanol production.

Col. O, ‘pelipsky is sold on point #2 as it is The Ukrainian salted pickled tomatoes jar knocking the drone of “End World Hunger” out of the sky. Food for Fuel on a massive scale makes that drone an unnecessary intrusion of a twit with a beauty queen mentality.

Farting away billions is bad for the collective’s environment. Especially an environment being bought up by Moobs Gates to grow food to be used as fuel. What? American Oil and Gas wasn’t plentiful enough, and it’s evil? ???
Makes ‘pelipsky hear that LoComodor Train coming.

Farting away billions a day on harmful ideas is bad for the Collective’s environment.

 

This is dangerous for Our Democracy™. Politicians like Elizabeth Warren play by a different set of rules than everyone else, accumulating power for their own personal gain. We need a stupidity tax, term limits and strong rules to hold Politicians accountable.

Margaret wrote: ↑

4/26/2022, 1:59 pm

Elizabeth Warren weighs in.

Apparently billionaires aren't subject to the law. Luckily Elizabeth Warren has taken upon herself royal queenly powers over all that which she surveys and can decide what is a crime and go about punishing people for the crimes she pulls out of her royal person. Now that's protecting equality before the law so that we don't live in a society of social rank so that we don't live under a tyranny of people that just pull laws out of their royal persons, i.e. the American idea of democracy.

Especially billionaires like Elon Musk and Donald Trump who know what they want to do. Men like that are dangerous to American Squaw, Crazybeth Warren. That Trump economy meant Trump was doing everything wrong, and CrazyBeth knew it, she just needed another term to get the proof.

Elon is a billionaire with democratic views above his legislated status, which is controlled by DNC Peace Treaty, enforced since 1968. CrazyBeth - warrior squaw - Warren will defend DNC territory while actually wearing a South African Tribal war bonnet as example of the DNC‘s territorial defense of unity of diversity against Elon.

Well Mrs. Warren, "Why don't you go build your own platform?"

Aaaah, Karma. A dish best served cold.

Minitrue wrote: ↑

4/26/2022, 3:42 pm

Well Mrs. Warren, "Why don't you go build your own platform?"

Aaaah, Karma. A dish best served cold.

I prefer my karma to be served with a slice of lemon meringue pie and a couple of scoops of vanilla ice cream, myself. It helps the poison pill go down a litter easier.

In other words, Elon Musk can still lose Twitter if a shareholder vote allows:

- Ballot harvesting
- Voting by mail
- No ID
- Dead shareholder voting
- Electronic vote manipulation
- FEC in charge
- Mike Pence and Mitt Romney representing Elon Musk during the count

Red Square wrote: ↑

4/27/2022, 1:19 pm

In other words, Elon Musk can still lose Twitter if a shareholder vote allows:

- Ballot harvesting
- Voting by mail
- No ID
- Dead shareholder voting
- Electronic vote manipulation
- FEC in charge
- Mike Pence and Mitt Romney representing Elon Musk during the count

Fact check:  True.