Image

White House to Segregate Transgender Staffers

User avatar
Val Pat Jarrett Neutralized 2.jpg
In an effort to lead by example, the Bystander Glorious Leader in Chief has approved the creation of gender-neutral restrooms for White House Staffers. Chief of Staff Valerie Jarrett wrote an op-ed in The Advocate, an LGBT Awareness Magazine, praising the president's progressiveness on this issue, saying in part:

"Today marks another important step forward in our collective journey toward justice and equality. This is progress which should only serve to feed our shared desire to continue moving forward toward the more perfect union we have each been charged to pursue."

Neither the Chief of Staff nor the President indicated exactly how segregating individuals on the basis of their respective gender identity moves us closer to the collective utopia we seek, free of distinctions based on such superficialities as gender, or the lack thereof. True collectivists make no such distinctions, and we look forward to the day when all genders can share the same space as co-equal members of the human race.

User avatar
But do these restrooms include litter boxes, fire hydrants, etc.? If not ... speciesist! Fie!

User avatar
Comrade Punk, would that mean, "White House Progresses Toward Gender Desegregation"? Would it not?

User avatar
Hammer and Loupe put it eloquently when he inquisitively wrote:Comrade Punk, would that mean, "White House Progresses Toward Gender Desegregation"? Would it not?


Thank you for asking esteemed comrade H&L. My understanding of the term 'segregation' is that it is the separating of one class from another. Therefore, true desegregation would be a single all-inclusive facility which accomodates all genders and everything in between without discriminating based on gender-identity nor neutrality. Adding another option for the in-between class merely separates and divides us further into smaller classes. Perhaps my understanding of kollectivism needs some tweeking, but I was under the impression that it means that we are all co-equals in every respect and should not seek to divide based upon perceived differences.


Capitalist Merriam-Webster defines segregation as:
the separation or isolation of a race, class, or ethnic group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social intercourse, by separate educational facilities, or by other discriminatory means

EDIT: This post was originally titled "White House Progresses Towards Segregation". Perhaps my error was in using the term 'Progresses' in the title of the post (which is the term used by Valerie Jarrett to describe the new policy). In that case you would be correct comrade H&L. I will seek an alternate title. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.

User avatar
Komrade Punk, the White House had to temporarily use stock unisex washroom signs until new transgender signs could be made by the gubmint printing office. Here is the new korrekt signage:

Val Pat Jarrett Neutralized1.jpg

User avatar
Gummipuppe wrote:Komrade Punk, the White House had to temporarily use stock unisex washroom signs until new transgender signs could be made by the gubmint printing office. Here is the new korrekt signage...
Thank you for your contribution Comrade GP... I would also like to express my displeasure at learning the true meaning of your 'handle'.

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:Thank you for your contribution Comrade GP... I would also like to express my displeasure at learning the true meaning of your 'handle'.

Glad to kontribute. LOL! You have only learned but one meaning, komrade Punk.

User avatar
Let's settle down now, Comrades,

In my home I have but one bathroom. Anyone who visits me is welcome to use it.

We have a sink, a toilet, and a shower/bathtub.

Only one person can go in there at a time, except when I join my sweetheart when I want to wash my face or brush my teeth. Other than that, it's pretty much transgender.

I don't see the problem here. (And, I'll bet this WH bathroom is a single user, as well.)

Talk about a non-issue. Pfffft!

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:
...I don't see the problem here. (And, I'll bet this WH bathroom is a single user, as well.)

Talk about a non-issue. Pfffft!


Komrade Pamalinksy, when necessary, problems and issues are manufaktured by Komrade Glorious Leader, and other high party officials, to advance the agenda. In this kase, the problem and issue koncerns the disposal of bodily waste from men who are trapped in womens's bodies and women who are trapped in mens' bodies, or somewhere in between, through no fault of their own. They are viktims who require our glorious gubbermint to ekstend them special privileges and force us to understand their special needs.

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:Let's settle down now, Comrades,

In my home I have but one bathroom. Anyone who visits me is welcome to use it.

We have a sink, a toilet, and a shower/bathtub.

Only one person can go in there at a time, except when I join my sweetheart when I want to wash my face or brush my teeth. Other than that, it's pretty much transgender.

I don't see the problem here. (And, I'll bet this WH bathroom is a single user, as well.)

Talk about a non-issue. Pfffft!
Yes, Comrade Pamalinsky, all homes being equal, we all have bathrooms that are open to all occupants and guests in our homes. That is what is so disturbing about the segregation that has taken hold at the White House. There should be but one bathroom, for all to enjoy equally. The next thing you know, they'll have transgender water-fountains as well...

Tranny Fountain.jpg

User avatar
A sly [color=#C0392B]Gummipuppe[/color] wrote:
Konservative_Punk wrote:Thank you for your contribution Comrade GP... I would also like to express my displeasure at learning the true meaning of your 'handle'.

Glad to kontribute. LOL! You have only learned but one meaning, komrade Punk.
craptek-off-topic-small-1.png

Little Known Fact -

Our own Ivan the Stakhanovets was on the original CCCP research team which developed the first Rubber Doll (Gummipuppe) in the early 1950s. Here he can be seen testing 'Little Honey' for moisture integrity as his own integrity sinks to the bottom of the lake.
.

ivan-rescues-a-gummipuppe-bw.jpg

User avatar
Here, here, komrades. Get your minds out of the gutter:



User avatar
Comrade Putout wrote:.
i-just-saw-a-nazi.jpg

Komrade Putout, in the immortal words of Maya Angelou, "At this point, what difference does it make?"

To begin with we owe a debt of gratitude to Germany for exporting kommunism to Russia during WWI, where it caught on and flourished to become the USSR, the archetype state on which the "fundamentally transformed" Amerika will be based. But, this time, our glorious party will make sure that it is a sucks-sess in settling the scores and providing "fair shares" for all.

Next, there is no fundamental difference between the National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party and Soviet Kommunist Party. Both parties assumed power by exploiting recognizing the misery of designated klasses of viktims and assigning kulpability to designated klasses of antagonists (enemies of the state). Since the ends justified the means in both parties, the power of gubermint was used by both to avenge the viktim's plight and settle the score through koercion, property seizure, forced labor, inprisonments, beatings, torture, and eksekutions. The force was with them. All the while, state run media in both Nazi Germany and the USSR attacked enemies of the states and glorified their regimes and leadership. The media and publik edukation system dutifully indoktrinated the proles with regard to the official party narratives. The new "normal" was aksepted, or else.

Komrades Hitler and Stalin were at first, best of buds, but, alas, their friendship didn't last very long. German National Socialism and Soviet kommunism were so similar as to be mutually eksklusive in the theater of world domination.

User avatar
Gummipuppe,

In a galaxy far, far away, I was dating a guy for a few weeks who began to show signs of being a control freak.

On Thanksgiving, he invited his darling 4-yr-old son (from a divorce) for dinner. I loved this boy and we got along great. He, the father, seemed to be threatened by this, and my usual frankness about things. I knew this was the end of this “relationship.”

So, I decided to act like the person he thought he should have. I stood by obediently, ready to clean his ashtray the moment he flicked an ash into it. I sat at Thanksgiving dinner, after fixing all of it, awaiting his permission to speak. He then picked up the carving knife and fork to slice the turkey saying, “I'll set this standard.” I did not eat until given permission.

Later, I did the dishes, cleaned everything up, and scrubbed the sides of the oven, a la scullery maid. I took it “over the top” because I couldn't believe he, or anyone, could like this sort of behavior. I wanted to see how far he would go. He absolutely loved this.

At the end of the day, he asked me to sit on his lap and asked, “What caused this wonderful change in behavior? I am astonished!”

I know he was expecting me to say something like, “Well, I know my place and I just want to please you”, sort of thing.

Instead I said, “I was putting you on the whole day. You obviously love it and should have it if that's what you want. I don't, and I think you should get yourself a blowup doll. That way you will always get what you want. I'm done.”

If only I had known about Gummipuppe, it would have saved me the effort to prove my point. It would have been worth the money. Still, putting this guy on was worth a bunch and I'm glad I did it!

He didn't know what hit him. And, he didn't care.

(BTW, I would have gotten him a doggie.)

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:...I stood by obediently, ready to clean his ashtray the moment he flicked an ash into it. I sat at Thanksgiving dinner, after fixing all of it, awaiting his permission to speak. He then picked up the carving knife and fork to slice the turkey saying, “I'll set this standard.” I did not eat until given permission.

Later, I did the dishes, cleaned everything up, and scrubbed the sides of the oven, a la scullery maid. I took it “over the top” because I couldn't believe he, or anyone, could like this sort of behavior. I wanted to see how far he would go. He absolutely loved this...
Cinderellinsky.jpg
He must have been a Republican... Any plans for next Thanksgiving?

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:
Pamalinsky wrote:...I stood by obediently, ready to clean his ashtray the moment he flicked an ash into it. I sat at Thanksgiving dinner, after fixing all of it, awaiting his permission to speak. He then picked up the carving knife and fork to slice the turkey saying, “I'll set this standard.” I did not eat until given permission.

Later, I did the dishes, cleaned everything up, and scrubbed the sides of the oven, a la scullery maid. I took it “over the top” because I couldn't believe he, or anyone, could like this sort of behavior. I wanted to see how far he would go. He absolutely loved this...
Cinderellinsky.jpg
He must have been a Republican... Any plans for next Thanksgiving?
Nah. He wasn't anything but a gormless Zombie.


 
POST REPLY